European Media Governance
US & European Film Audiences (1997)
Film Market Share, 2000
|
Country
|
Number of
films produced |
Total receipts
(millions) |
Domestic film
industry share |
US film
industry share |
| Australia |
31
|
401.00
|
8.0
|
87.5
|
| France |
204
|
821.30
|
28.9
|
58.3
|
| Germany |
75
|
463.50
|
9.4
|
81.9
|
| Italy |
103
|
258.10
|
17.5
|
69.5
|
| Japan |
282
|
1585.30
|
31.8
|
64.8
|
| Spain |
98
|
297.10
|
10.1
|
82.7
|
| UK |
90
|
941.20
|
19.6
|
75.3
|
| USA |
460
|
7661.00
|
96.1
|
--
|
Reasons for American media dominance in Europe (Lower & Leaver, pg. 251)
Tension between two approaches in EU Telecomm Policy (Lower & Leaver, pg. 252)
1. creation of the single market and promoting the interest
of EC businesses (free market rules)
2. cater to the role that information plays in society at large, including guarantees
of cultural diversity
European Union Television Without Frontiers Directive (Lower & Leaver, pg. 254)
Two basic principles:
1. the free movement of European television programs within
the internal market and;
2. the requirement that television channels, where practicable,
reserve over half their broadcasting time for European works ("broadcasting
quotas").
Article 4: Obliges Member States to impose on broadcasters within their jurisdiction an obligation "where practicable" to reserve a majority of their transmission time for "European works."
Article 5: Requires Member States to ensure, where practicable, that broadcasters within their jurisdiction devote 10% of their transmission time or, at the discretion of Member States, of their programming budget for European works created by producers who are independent of broadcasters.
Article 6: Defines European works as:
(a) works originating from Member States;
(b) works originating from European third States party to the European Convention
on Transfrontier Television of the Council of Europe and fulfilling the conditions
of paragraph 2;
(c) works originating from other European third countries and fulfilling the
conditions of paragraph 3.22
Further detail is added by article 6(2):
The works referred to in paragraph 1 (a) and (b) are works mainly made with authors and workers residing in one or more States referred to in paragraph 1 (a) and (b) provided that they comply with one of the following three conditions:
(a) they are made by one or more producers established in one
or more of those States; or
(b) production of the works is supervised and actually controlled by one or
more producers established in one or more of those States; or
(c) the contribution of co-producers of those States to the total coproduction
costs is preponderant and the co-production is not controlled by one or more
producers established outside those States.
US Objections
International Joint Ventures (Tinic, pgs. 171-174)
Types of IJV:
1. Official coproductions - both countries make a roughly equal financial and creative investment in the project. Allows both countries to benefit from subsidies and tax incentives.
2. Coventures - projects developed between producers in countries that do not have a formalized coproduction treaty, the primary goal is to share the costs and financial risks of the production process.
3. Twinning package - producers in both countries develop and produce comparable yet distinct domestic projects and then partner them so that each will receive airtime in the other's broadcast market.
Effects of IJVs on Content (Tinic, pgs. 174-176)
De-spatialization of place and space:
1. stories that represent particularities of place are able to achieve universal resonance because of the global restructuring of community
2. stories are developed to de-emphasize place in order to appeal to universal "human fundamentals" that may obscure the specificities of place.